The aim of this experiment was to determine measurable differences of grape quality by utilizing Heat Blast technology used to treat wine grapes. A block of Petit Manseng was divided into two separate sections. One section was treated with heat blast delivery to the canopy and fruiting zones using an Agrothermal Systems XT heat system. The other section was not treated with this technology. The treatment block was treated 1 to 4 times per month depending on stage of growth, with the treatment regime starting around veraison. The majority of treatments were near veraison. Chemical spray regimes were the same between treatments. All other vineyard and winemaking treatments between grapes were equal. Acidity and potassium was slightly lower in the heat-treated grapes. Quercetin and tannin slightly increased in grapes, whereas catechin slightly decreased. Wine chemistry was not very much affected except for lower malic acid levels in the heat treatment. The tannin content of wine with heat treatment was slightly higher for most compounds. Overall, these wines were not found to be significantly different. There was a very slight tendency for the Control to have higher Tropical Fruit intensity, Fruit Intensity, and Body. No major preference trends could be seen between wines. In the future, more studies should be performed with Agrothermal heat treatment and its impacts on fruit chemistry. These studies should look into multiple grape varieties, as well as closely monitor disease progression. The use of Agrothermal heat treatment in conjunction with different vineyard spray regimes should be investigated as well. Although more studies are needed to confirm this, these preliminary results suggest that heat treatment may be a beneficial tool for East Coast viticulture.
This study compares the effects of destemming and cold soaking Petit Manseng Grapes for 6 hours prior to pressing compared to directly pressing whole clusters. Juice produced with skin contact showed higher pH without much change in TA. The wine which underwent skin contact showed much lower TA and much higher pH. Skin contact also increased color intensity, catechin, tannin, caffeic acid, gallic acid, and astilbin. Caftaric acid was decreased by skin contact. This loss in caftaric acid and gain in caffeic acid could be due to equilibrium pressure. Sensory testing found the wines to be significantly different. Direct to Press wines had a slight tendency for higher Tropical Fruit aromatics, and a strong tendency for these wines to have higher Overall Aromatic Intensity. Skin-Contacted wines had strong tendencies towards increased Bitterness, and a slight tendency for higher Astringency. In general, people tended to prefer wines made from direct pressing. Studies of this kind, in conjunction with phenolic fining studies, should be performed in the future.
This study compares Petit Manseng wine fermented either with or without the enological tannin Tan Citrus (Enartis) added before primary fermentation. When combined with yeast with β-glycosidic activity, this tannin may increase fruit and floral aromas in wine. The yeast used in this study was 58W3, a glycosidic yeast. No major chemical differences were found between wines. Wines made with Tan Citrus had higher tannin content and slightly lowered grape reaction product, which may suggest that Tan Citrus helped protect the wine against oxidation. Triangle sensory testing revealed that the wines were significantly different (p<0.001). No major sensory trends could be seen with the descriptors used in this study, and judges were split on which wine they preferred.
This study examines the effect of adding fining agents to hyperoxidized Petit Manseng juice on the sensory and phenolic characteristics of Petit Manseng. After reducing the temperature to 10-12°C, Petit Manseng juice was hyperoxidized by pumping four volumes of juice over a sump screen, taking about 10 minutes. After this process, juice was very brown and then sulfur dioxide was added at 50ppm. Juice was then split into two vessels, one of which was fined with casein, PVPP, and bentonite to remove solids and phenolic compounds. All other treatments between juices and wines were identical. Overall, no major chemical, color, or phenolic differences were observed between the wines, suggesting that fining juice after hyperoxidation does not do much to alter the color and phenolic properties of the wine. Triangle testing suggests that the wines were significantly different from each other (p<0.001), likely due to a difference in turbidity. No preferences could be seen for one wine over the other. The fined wine had a slight tendency for lower Tropical Fruit and increased Bitterness/Astringency.
In a vertical flight of Petit Manseng featuring a 2008, 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014, the 2014 was the most preferred. However, this study did not examine the effect of age on the same vintage of Petit Manseng over time, so it is difficult to conclusively say that the youngest wine was preferred.
Petit Manseng wine was treated with bentonite in order to assess its effect on the chemical and sensory attributes of the wine. No chemical differences were observed between wines, and there was a slight sensory preference for wine not treated with bentonite.
Petit Manseng with East/West planting had leaf pulling on the north and south exposure at the end of June. The remainder of the block had leaf pull on only the northern exposure, also at the end of June. No chemical differences were found between the grapes from this project. No sensory data is available.